Tim, you forgot to mention the word "verticale".

It appears to be a translation failure at least in French and perhaps in German also.

What meaning did you wish to give to this word ? (AGL, AAL, AMSL, something else ?)

You should use only aeronautical terms and not words from general vocabulary, this leads to confusion.

From the point of view of the graphic design, the logical way of presenting information, and the quality of the translation, the "What's Here?" experience has been redesigned by a student to present  information less effectively.

You should accept this fact rather than looking for explanations that don't hold water. 

If you think the lowest airspace should be at the top of the airspace list, then you could also turn the chart upside down for the next release 😉 ... (The student will be happy to have something to do) 😀

On small Form factor Tims comment makes sense. A reversed stack would mean scrolling to see the most relevant info.

I don't understand why people who use 8, 9,10,11 inch screens should endure limitations because of people using a smartphone to fly.

A smartphone is too small to allow fast manipulations, it consumes time and show less informations than a regular tab screen. The rule should not be dictated by a poorly adapted tool.

Now I will be quiet (I don't want to bore anyone),

and patiently await for the aeronautical définition of "Vertical 2500ft - FL115" 🤔

✨I'm curious to know who approved this before release.

🤗

As always: great work.

One suggestion for the „What is here“ Tab:

The callout „vertical“ is unnecessary and self evident. It would rather help to have the different airspaces vertically stacked in the right order, meaning the lowest airspace at the bottom and the highest airspace on top. 

That would be easier to read…

Thanks a lot 😊